The Official Journal of the Turkish Society of Algology
ISSN 1300-0012 E-ISSN 2458-9446

Meryem Onay, Osman Kaya, Çağla Bilgin, Birgül Büyükkıdan Yelken, Mehmet Sacit Güleç

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir, Türkiye

According to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol, the aim is to accelerate postoperative recovery and reduce postoperative complications in major abdominal surgeries using multimodal analgesia techniques. Among these techniques, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), spinal analgesia, and abdominal wall blocks (transversus abdominis plane [TAP] block, subcostal TAP block, and rectus sheath block) are recommended multimodal analgesia techniques. However, there are concerns regarding the short duration of effects of abdominal wall blocks. To prolong their effects, infusion catheters or liposomal bupivacaine are recommended.[1,2] Although erector spinae plane blocks (ESPB) were initially described for neuropathic pain, they are also used in the treatment of acute and chronic pain. The ability to sonographically visualize the transverse process and its key role in needle advancement makes the block simple and safe, leading to its widespread use today. It has been demonstrated that a single dose of ESPB contributes to postoperative analgesia in kidney surgeries.[3,4] Since the application of ESP catheters is not documented in the literature for open nephrectomies, we aimed to share our experience.

Our patient was a 62-year-old male with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification of III. and underwent open radical nephrectomy via a subcostal incision due to renal cell cancer. The patient had hypertension and widespread vertebral bone metastases due to prostate cancer. Despite being a gold standard technique, TEA was avoided. The patient was planned to have an ESPB catheter for postoperative analgesia and was placed in the prone position after routine monitoring. Midazolam 2 mg and fentanyl 50 mcg were administered intravenously for sedation. The lower end of the scapula at the T7 vertebra was identified and marked. The skin was cleaned with povidone-iodine 10% antiseptic solution. The Philips Affiniti 50 ultrasound C6-2 convex probe (Philips Medical Systems, Seattle, WA, United States) was used. After the transverse process was identified, an 18-gauge Touhy needle (Combifix Standard, Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia Set, 18 G, Egemen International; TMT Tıbbi Medikal Malz. San. ve Tic. A. Ş. İzmir, Türkiye) was advanced from the cephalic to the caudal direction using the in-plane technique. The location was confirmed using 1-2 mL of saline after the needle contacted the posterior surface of the transverse process. After hydrodissection, a unilateral ESP block was performed with 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine at the ESPB thoracic 8 level, and the catheter was placed 3 cm inside by the experienced authors [O.K.] (Figure 1). General anesthesia was administered using propofol 2-3 mg/kg, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg, and fentanyl 1 mcg/kg. Anesthesia maintenance included sevoflurane at 2-3% and remifentanil infusion at 0.05-0.2 mcg/kg. The Bispectral index score was maintained between 40 and 50. The duration of surgery was 220 min, and intraoperative remifentanil consumption was 540 mcg. At the end of the surgery, the patient was extubated and administered 1 g of paracetamol and 1 mg/kg of tramadol. A continuous infusion of 10 mL/h of 0.25% bupivacaine was maintained through the catheter intraoperatively and postoperatively for 24 h. Paracetamol 1 g was administered intravenously every 8 h. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score did not reach ≥ 4 during the postoperative 48-h period. Morphine consumption was 19 mg at 24 h and 37 mg at 48 h. The patient did not require rescue analgesia. The ESPB catheter was removed by the experienced authors [Ç.U.] at 24 hours postoperatively. The patient was discharged on the fifth day. A written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report.

Although TEA is considered the gold standard in major abdominal surgeries, its use is limited due to undesirable effects and contraindications. Compared to our previous randomized controlled trial, 24-h opioid consumption was similar, but VAS scores were lower.[3] Van den Broek et al.[5] reported that the ESP block is noninferior to TEA in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The block is reported to spread local anesthetic into the epidural or paravertebral space, leading to the blockade of the dorsal and ventral branches of thoracic and abdominal nerves as well as sympathetic ganglia, preventing somatic and visceral pain.[3] However, due to the unilateral placement of the catheter, no perioperative complications were encountered.

In conclusion, fascial plane blocks may reduce complications compared to traditional techniques and provide effective and safe analgesia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate their role as a component of postoperative multimodal analgesia, especially in major abdominal surgeries.

Cite this article as: Onay M, Kaya O, Bilgin Ç, Büyükkıdan Yelken B, Güleç MS. Ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block in radical nephrectomy. Agri 2026;38(4):309-311. doi: 10.5606/agri.2026.71.

Author Contributions

M.O.: Concept, design, writing; B.B.Y., M.S.G.: Supervision, vritical review; O.K., Ç.U., M.O.: Resource; O.K.: Materials; O.K., Ç.U.: Data collection and/or processing; M.O., M.S.G.: Analysis and/or interpretation, literature review.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Use for AI for Writing Assistance

The authors declare that artificial intelligence (AI) tools were not used, or were used solely for language editing, and had no role in data analysis, interpretation, or the formulation of conclusions. All scientific content, data interpretation, and conclusions are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors further confirm that AI tools were not used to generate, fabricate, or ‘hallucinate’ references, and that all references have been carefully verified for accuracy.

Financial Disclosure

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

Data Sharing Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Oodit R, Biccard BM, Panieri E, Alvarez AO, Sioson MRS, Maswime S, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective abdominal and pelvic surgery at primary and secondary hospitals in Low-MiddleIncome Countries (LMIC's): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) society recommendation. World J Surg 2022;46:1826-43. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06587-w.
  2. Carver A, Wou F, Pawa A. Do outcomes differ between thoracic epidurals and continuous fascial plane blocks in adults undergoing major abdominal surgery?. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 2024;14:25-41.
  3. Onay M, Erdoğan Kayhan G, Özen A, Şanal Baş S, Yelken B. Comparison of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block and erector spinae plane block in terms of their effects on postoperative pain in open nephrectomy. Minerva Anestesiol 2023;89:32-9. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.22.16635-6.
  4. Abdelgalil AS, Ahmed AM, Gamal RM, Elshal MM, Bakeer AH, Shaker EH. Ultrasound guided continuous erector spinae plane block versus patient controlled analgesia in open nephrectomy for renal malignancies: A randomized controlled study. J Pain Res 2022;15:3093-102. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S379721.
  5. van den Broek RJC, Postema JMC, Koopman JSHA, van Rossem CC, Olsthoorn JR, van Brakel TJ, et al. Continuous erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A prospective randomized open-label noninferiority trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2025;50:11-9. doi: 10.1136/ rapm-2023-105047.

Figure and Tables