Alihan Derincek1, Evren Eker2, Ayşin Pourbagher3, Murat Bekir Çınar1, Metin Özalay1

1Baskent University School Of Medicine, Department Of Orthopedics And Traumatology, Adana Medical Center, Adana, Turkey.
2Baskent University School Of Medicine, Department Of Anesthesiology And Pain Medication, Adana Medical Center, Adana, Turkey
3Baskent University School Of Medicine, Department Of Radiology, Adana Medical Center, Adana, Turkey

Keywords: epidural injection, disc herniation, percent canal compromise

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study is to determine the relation between the percent of canal compromise and success rate of epidural steroid injection (ESI) in patients with lumbar herniated intervertebral discs.

Material and Methods: Patients with lumbar herniated intervertebral disc suffered from leg pain and treated with ESI were selected. The axial MRI showing the largest canal compromise by the herniated disc was selected for measurements. The canal and herniation area measurement were calculated from the number of pixels per cross-sectional area, multiplied by a scan correction factor, mm2 /pixel. The percent canal compromise was obtained by disc herniation area divided by canal cross-section area and multiplied by 100. For pain assessment, VAS was used before (pre-injection VAS) and a month after ESI (post-injection VAS). Demographic data, duration of symptoms, location and type of herniation were noted.

Results: 39 patients were included in this study. Mean age was 50. 21 of cases also had back pain. Mean percent canal compromise ratio was 36,1%. Mean duration of symptoms was 19,4 months. The post-injection VAS was significantly decreased when compared with pre-injection VAS (p<0,0001) and this significance was related with if duration of symptoms shorter than 3 months (p=0,021). There was a significant negative correlation between percent canal compromise and post-injection VAS (p=0,042). There was no correlation between post-injection VAS and age, sex, location and type of herniation (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The patient had shorter duration of symptoms and high percent of canal compromise could have more benefit from ESI.